Do Gardasil Vaccines Make Any Sense?
Do Gardasil Vaccines Make Any Sense?
A vaccine is a carefully designed chemical preparation that supplies adequate immune action to a specific infectious agent. A vaccine is made by stimulating the body’s own natural defense system to fight against a disease or to protect against exposure to it. A vaccine contains an agent which looks like a pathogen and is usually made of a weakened or destroyed form of this microbe, its antibodies, or one of its protein components. When the appropriate immune complex is introduced into the body, it rapidly mounts a protective response against the pathogen. The result is that a susceptible individual is protected and the pathogen is not able to reproduce.
In order for a vaccine to be considered effective, it must contain a live pathogen that is capable of invading and causing infection in an appropriate host. Most vaccines are designed to provide short-term protection against common childhood diseases. However, there are some diseases that vaccine developers consider intrapersonal because they are often involved in personal health, such as breast cancer and herpes outbreaks.
A vaccine uses genetically engineered microorganisms or micro-organisms that do not provoke an allergic reaction in humans. By producing these living entities in amounts very low enough to elicit no symptoms in the recipient, the vaccine manufacturers can produce a final product that is capable of sustaining strong immune defenses in the face of infection. Vets agree that although this approach produces fewer side effects than when a person is exposed to live germs, the risks are similar. The difference lies in the manner in which the immune triggers are introduced into the body. Germs that are exposed to humans are usually killed by natural killer cells which are part of the body’s natural defense systems but are overactive during times of stress.
In contrast, inactivated vaccines induce a response by eliciting a release of the protective chemicals lactocidin and phytochemicals from the bovine ovalbumin, which usually protect against viruses. Lactocidin and phytochemicals neither stimulate nor hinder the growth of bacteria; they simply overwhelm uninfected germs. In recent years, some of these vaccines have included a component called porphyrins. Scientists theorize that porphyrins act in a way analogous to toxins produced by pathogenic microbes. Porphyrins may prevent or interfere with the replication of pathogenic bacteria.
Although inactivated vaccines are safer than live vaccines, there are concerns about long-term exposure to disinfection by using tap water, even though the FDA has not approved the use of chlorine in connection with the manufacture of vaccines. Also, some experts question the use of bactericidal agents in food and the risks associated with such usage. Some natural health advocates argue that vaccines are not safe enough and that some studies cited by vaccine makers are incomplete and that the data on which they are based are biased. They further assert that since some vaccines are formulated to stimulate the immune system rather than preventing disease, the immune system is not protected by the vaccine.
Studies concerning the safety of some of these ingredients have been controversial. One study comparing the effects of listeria with those of hepatitis showed a high risk for patients who already had one or more infections of listeria. Researchers added the small amounts of the two chemicals because they thought that it might give protection against other diseases as well. Another study comparing the effects of Gardasil with those of small amounts of penicillin showed that there was no significant difference in the rates of infection between the groups. When the FDA attempted to regulate the use of Gardasil and other vaccines made with the same ingredients as Lufenuron and Cervarix, it was unable to pass legislation intended to protect children from receiving contaminated vaccines. For this reason, all of these Gardasil-related studies remain inconclusive.